Perhaps it's always been common; however, recently, there have been an abundance of reports of liberals displaying their intellectual capacity. Often times, demeaning the questioner in the process of not answering the question. Of course, the big one was Sen. Feinstein playing on emotion in response to Sen. Ted Cruz's question regarding constitutional application to the propsed "Assault Weapons" ban.
Then we have an "unknown" senator (Leahy/Senator Depends, I presume) mocking Sen. Cruz during his questioning of Sen. Feinstein.
Then we had Nancy Pelosi spouting off about the budget.
Then we had President Obama slapping down one of his own in response to a MI Representative's question regarding the creation of jobs in his district.
Then we move to the press:
Chris Matthews tries to knock Trump about birtherism.
WaPo is in serious crisis mode over the Senator Menendez scandal. The Daily Caller is making them look like the upstart newspaper here. Not the other way around.
Then we have Andrea Mitchell stating that Ted Cruz isn't in a fair fight when it comes to lecturing Feinstein on the Constitution.
This is a 48 hour period you guys. What strikes me the most out of all of these articles is one common thread. The libs are on defense in every single one. I can't recall a time, especially in the last 5 years, where I've seen the libs on defense. What is the sudden turnaround? Why are they back pedalling?
Agree or disagree, Rand Paul's fillibuster has had a profound impact. His 13 hour Randathon was epic in many ways, but first and foremost, he took it to the libs. He didn't play on emotion. He offered his interpretation, presented numerous facts, statistics, and contorted his beliefs by tying the constitution to them. It changed the tone in Washington. 3 Senators on the Republican side have made a stand. They have drawn a clear line, and they have said "we ain't playin'".
The republicans who are causing such a stir are framing their arguments in sound fashion. Much like Rand Paul, the questions they raise are irrefutable. By demanding such an easy answer to an assinine question regarding drone strikes on Americans in America, Senator Paul was able to expose the left for who they are. By taking over a month to answer whether or not the administration thought it was constitutional to kill Americans in America with a drone, the pause was long enough to raise doubt in every mind who heard the story.
McCain and Grahm were right in saying that the question was silly and assinine. That was the point. By defending not answering the question, and after a month of dicking around, Holder finally provided a clear, distinct answer following the fillibuster. Rand Paul won. Big. All the left (and semi-right) had left to do was demean the messenger, demagogue his actions, and name call.
Follow that up with Ted Cruz. Regarding Obamacare, Senator Cruz's ammendment in the Senate to defund Obamacare did not have one defector from the Republican side of the aisle. Not one defector! That's huge you guys. I'm just in awe of what these freshmen Senators are doing in the name of liberty. They are calling out the stupid and exposing them for who they are. It's a great thing.
It gives me hope. Rubio said at CPAC yesterday that we (Republicans, of which I am not) don't need a new idea. We have an awesome idea already. It's name is America, and it always works. These guys keep it up, and we'll get this thing turned around. I commend them for standing up and taking this bull by the horns. They are great Senators, and we need more like them. So, as the libs will sit there and tell you how stupid you are, because they are the smartest people in the room, keep an eye on the guys who are not allowed in that room. Cruz, Rubio and Paul. If this is the future of the Republican Party, I may, at some point, go ahead and register.
No comments:
Post a Comment